Cardiorespiratory and sensory responses to exercise in well-controlled asthmatics

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate detailed ventilatory, cardiovascular and sensory responses to cycle exercise in sedentary patients with well-controlled asthma and healthy controls. Methods: Subjects included sedentary patients meeting criteria for well-controlled asthma (n = 14), and healthy age- and activity-matched controls (n = 14). Visit 1 included screening for eligibility, medical history, anthropometrics, physical activity assessment, and pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry. Visit 2 included spirometry and a symptom limited incremental cycle exercise test. Detailed ventilatory, cardiovascular and sensory responses were measured at rest and throughout exercise. Results: Asthmatics and controls were well matched for age, body mass index and physical activity levels. Baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁) was similar between asthmatics and controls (98 ± 10 versus 95 ± 9% predicted, respectively, p > 0.05). No significant differences were observed between asthmatics and controls for maximal oxygen uptake (31.8 ± 5.6 versus 30.6 ± 5.9 ml/kg/min, respectively, p > 0.05) and power output (134 ± 35 versus 144 ± 32 W, respectively, p > 0.05). Minute ventilation (V_E) relative to maximum voluntary ventilation (V_E/MVV) was similar between groups at maximal exercise with no subjects showing evidence of ventilatory limitation. Asthmatics and controls achieved similar age-predicted maximum heart rates (92 ± 7 versus 93 ± 8% predicted, respectively, p > 0.05). Ratings of perceived breathing discomfort and leg fatigue were not different between groups throughout exercise. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that sedentary patients with well-controlled asthma have preserved sensory and cardiorespiratory responses to exercise with no evidence of exercise impairment or ventilatory limitation.

• Cardiac limitation
• cardiopulmonary exercise testing
• dyspnea
• physiology
• ventilation
• ventilatory limitation

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

JG was supported by a Scholar Award from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research and a New Investigator Award from the Providence Health Care Research Institute and St. Paul’s Hospital Foundation.