Outcomes of follow-up care after an emergency department visit among pediatric asthmatics in the military health system

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Asthma exacerbations frequently trigger emergency department (ED) visits. Guidelines recommend timely follow-up after an ED visit for asthma, however, other studies have questioned the quality of follow-up care and their effect on subsequent ED utilization. We evaluated follow-up care on asthma outcomes in pediatric asthmatics enrolled in the Military Health System (MHS) after an ED visit for asthma. Methods: This retrospective study utilized MHS data to evaluate 2–17-year-old persistent asthmatics with an ED visit for asthma between 2010–2012. Demographics, medication dispensing, and subsequent asthma related ED and hospital utilization were compared between those with or without a 28-day follow-up appointment. Results: 10,460 of 88,837 persistent asthmatics met inclusion criteria for an asthma ED visit. 4,964 (47.5%) had ≥ 1 follow-up visit. In the 29–365 days after their ED visit, 21.1% of the follow-up cohort required an ED re-visit compared to 24.0% of the patients without follow-up. Follow-up care was associated with a reduction in ED re-visits (adjusted hazard ratio 0.86; 95% confidence interval 0.79, 0.93). Controller medications were dispensed to 76.0% of the follow-up cohort within 90 days of their ED visit compared to 49.7% in the group without follow-up. Conclusions: Despite universal access to healthcare, less than half of pediatric MHS asthma patients had follow-up within 28 days of an ED visit. Those with follow-up were more likely to fill a controller medication within 90 days post-ED visit, and less likely to have an asthma ED re-visit in the subsequent year.

Keywords:

• Asthma
• pediatric
• emergency department
• follow-up visits

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center and Naval Medical Center Portsmouth for their support during the conduct of this study. We thank Kelly Kelleher, MD, for his thoughtful review of the manuscript.

Declaration of interest

Research data derived from an approved Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, VA IRB protocol. The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense or the United States Government. Copyright Notice: LCDR Michael Smiley and CAPT Rees Lee are military service members. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C. 105 provides that ‘Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.’ Title 17 U.S.C. 101 defines a United States Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employee of the United States Government as part of that person's official duties. The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.