608
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Gender-specific association of psychological distress with cardiovascular risk scores

, , , &
Pages 36-40 | Received 26 May 2009, Accepted 13 Jan 2010, Published online: 24 Mar 2010
 

Abstract

Objective. To examine the gender differences in the association of psychological distress with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk scores using two different CVD risk assessment models. Design and setting. A cross-sectional, population-based study from 1997 to 1998 in Pieksämäki, Finland. Subjects. A population sample of 899 (399 male and 500 female) middle-aged subjects. Main outcome measures. The 10-year risk for CVD events was calculated using the European SCORE model and the Framingham CVD risk prediction model. Psychological distress was measured using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Study subjects were allocated into three groups according to their global GHQ-12 -scores: 0 points, 1–2 points, and 3–12 points. Results. Psychological distress was associated with higher mean CVD risk scores in men. Men in the highest GHQ group (3–12 points) had significantly higher mean European CVD risk score (3.6 [SD 3.3]) compared with men in the lowest group (0 points) (2.5 [SD 2.6]), the difference being 1.1 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.9). The p-value for linearity between the three GHQ groups was 0.003. The Framingham CVD risk prediction model yielded similar results: 15.7 (SD 10.2) vs. 12.3 (SD 9.6), the difference 3.4 (95% CI 1.0 to 6.0) and p-value for linearity 0.008. No significant association was observed in women. Conclusion. A gender-specific association was found betwen psychological distress and cardiovascular risk scores. These results highlight the importance of identifying men with psychological distress when assessing CVD risk.

Ethical approval

The ethics committee of Kuopio University approved this study, and participants provided informed written consent.

Source of funding and conflict of interests

There was no external source of funding. The authors have no conflicts of interests to declare related to this paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.