828
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Comparison of Iopromide versus Iohexol in Aortobifemoral Arteriography

A Swedish multi-center study of 446 patients

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 130-133 | Accepted 25 Oct 1990, Published online: 07 Jan 2010
 

Abstract

A double-blind randomized, clinical trial was conducted in 9 hospitals comparing the use of non-ionic contrast media (CM) iopromide 300 (Ultravist) and iohexol 300 (Omnipaque) during peripheral arteriography in a total of 446 patients. after premedication with morphine-scopolamine each patient was given two consecutive injections of 50 ml CM/at a rate of 12 ml/s above the aortic bifurcation. Both CM were well tolerated. There were no differences between the two substances as far as general tolerance, pulse rate, blood pressure, sensation of heat or pain after CM injection were concerned.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.