2,583
Views
51
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Early tumor shrinkage in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line treatment with cetuximab combined with either CAPIRI or CAPOX: An analysis of the German AIO KRK 0104 trial

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 956-962 | Received 04 Oct 2012, Accepted 18 Nov 2012, Published online: 18 Dec 2012
 

Abstract

Purpose. This study investigated the impact of early tumor shrinkage (ETS) on progression-free- (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated within the AIO KRK 0104 trial as first-line therapy. Moreover, correlations of ETS with clinical characteristics and prognostic markers were evaluated. Patients and methods. In total, 121 patients were included into this analysis. Patients were treated with cetuximab combined with either CAPIRI or CAPOX. ETS at six weeks was defined as a relative change of ≥ 20% in the sum of the longest diameters of target lesions compared to baseline. Survival times were compared between patients with ETS ≥ 20% versus no-ETS. Results. ETS ≥ 20% was observed in 59% of all patients with KRAS wild-type tumors. In these patients ETS ≥ 20% was associated with higher overall response rate (82% vs. 19%, p < 0.001). Also, PFS (8.9 vs. 4.7 months, p < 0.001) and OS (31.6 vs. 15.8 months, p = 0.005) were significantly superior in ETS ≥ 20% of patients compared to no-ETS. In patients with KRAS mutant mCRC ETS ≥ 20% neither had an effect on PFS nor OS. Cetuximab-induced skin toxicity correlated with the occurrence of ETS ≥ 20% (p = 0.002). Conclusion. In patients with KRAS wild-type tumors treated with cetuximab plus capecitabine-based chemotherapy ETS ≥ 20% is an important predictor of favorable outcome.

Acknowledgments

We thank all of the patients and their families, the participating centers of the AIO KRK 0104 trial, and the entire medical staff who contributed to patient care. We also thank Matthias Wolff for expert secretarial help and organization. The AIO KRK 0104 trial was supported by Merck.

Potential conflicts of interest: DPM: Travel support: Amgen, Merck, Roche; Honoraria: Amgen, Merck; RPL: Travel support: Merck; SS: Travel support: Merck, Roche; Honoraria: Merck, Roche; CG: Travel support: Roche; VH: Honoraria/Advisory Boards: Amgen, Merck, Roche. UM: travel support/research grant: Merck.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.