1,131
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLES

No association found between CYP2D6 genotype and early breast cancer events in tamoxifen-treated patients

, , , &
Pages 195-200 | Received 27 May 2013, Accepted 26 Aug 2013, Published online: 14 Oct 2013
 

Abstract

Background. CYP2D6 is considered the key enzyme in tamoxifen metabolism. Several studies have investigated the relationship between the CYP2D6 genotype and tamoxifen treatment outcome, with discrepant results. CYP2D6 inhibitor use, aromatase inhibitor use, and chemotherapy may account for some of the discrepancies. We examined the association between CYP2D6 genotype and early breast cancer events in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients, in relation to CYP2D6 inhibitor use, aromatase inhibitor use, and chemotherapy. Material and methods. Pre- and postoperative questionnaires on lifestyle and concomitant medications were completed by 634 primary breast cancer patients between 2002 and 2008, among whom 333 patients had ER-positive tumors and received tamoxifen. CYP2D6*3, *4, *6, *10 and *41 were genotyped. Information on clinical data, breast cancer events, and tumor characteristics was obtained from patients’ charts, population registries, the Regional Tumor Registry, and pathology reports. Results. Median follow-up was 4.9 years. Neither poor metabolizers (adjusted HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.07–3.82) nor intermediate metabolizers (adjusted HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.47–2.11) had an increased risk of early breast cancer events when compared with extensive metabolizers. CYP2D6 activity score (taking into account genotype and CYP2D6 inhibitor use) was not associated with early breast cancer events (LogRank, Ptrend = 0.44). Conclusions. CYP2D6 genotype was not associated with tamoxifen treatment outcome, even when CYP2D6 inhibitor use, aromatase inhibitor use, or chemotherapy was taken into account. CYP2D6 genotype may be of minor importance for tamoxifen-treated patients in Scandinavia.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank our research nurses: Anette Ahlin Gullers, Monika Meszaros, Maj-Britt Hedenblad, Karin Henriksson, Anette Möller, and Linda Ågren. We thank Sol-Britt Olsson, Nils-Gunnar Lundin, and Kristina Lövgren for taking care of blood samples. We also wish to thank Erika Bågeman, Maria Simonsson, and Maria Henningson for taking care of blood samples and data entry, and Dr Eric Dryver for proofreading.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. This work was supported by grants from The Swedish Cancer Society CAN 2011/497, the Medical Research Council K2012-54X-22027-01-3 (PI H Jernström), the Medical Faculty at Lund University, the Mrs. Berta Kamprad Foundation, the Gunnar Nilsson Foundation, the Swedish Breast Cancer Group (BRO), the South Swedish Health Care Region (Region Skåne ALF), Konung Gustaf V:s Jubileumsfond, and the Lund Hospital Fund.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.