Abstract
The Nottingham Paediatric Cochlear Implant Programme (NPCIP) specializes in the cochlear implantation of children under the age of 5 years. The initial stage in the pre-implant evaluation process is audiological assessment. In complex paediatric cases, behavioural audiological assessment may be difficult. In such cases, an objective measure to verify the aided hearing threshold is desirable. This study compares unaided and aided hearing thresholds, by both objective and behavioural techniques, in 20 children (aged <1–10 years). Objective data were collected from auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and behavioural thresholds were measured by use of developmental age-appropriate tests. When comparing the unaided ABR click threshold to the behavioural threshold (obtained from the average of 1–4 kHz warble tones) the ABR threshold was, on average, 9 dB lower (more sensitive). Using the same comparison for aided responses a difference of <5 dB was observed. Unaided ABR thresholds resulted in 35% of subjects responding to the click stimulation (when using a maximum stimulation level of 105 dB nHL), whereas introducing aided ABR measurement elicited positive results in 75% of subjects. The effect of the hearing aid on the stimulus was measured by use of a 2 cc coupler which was connected to a precision sound level meter, whose AC output was recorded onto digital audiotape. Analysis of the resultant output spectra in the frequency domain highlighted signal non-linearity and distortion when using high-intensity stimuli with moderate to high aid gains. In conclusion, aided ABR thresholds are valuable in the management of young children. However, when performing either ABR or behavioural aided hearing threshold measurements it is essential to be aware of the limitations of the hearing aid and the stimulus.