2,364
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Reflections on fertility and postponed parenthood—interviews with highly educated women and men without children in Sweden

, , &
Pages 122-129 | Received 11 Dec 2012, Accepted 19 Dec 2012, Published online: 10 Jan 2013
 

Abstract

Background. Different reasons influence the current low birth-rate and the postponement of the birth of the first child throughout Europe. The aim of this study was to explore how highly educated women and men in Sweden reflect on fertility and postponed parenthood.

Methods. We interviewed women (n = 22) and men (n = 18) who had started their professional careers and still had no children. Data were analysed with qualitative content analysis.

Results. Fertility was perceived as an unconsidered capacity, sometimes unpredictable, and different for women and men, but nevertheless taken for granted. The participants were of the opinion that fertility could be restored by assisted reproductive technologies or replaced by alternatives to a biological child. Postponed parenthood was described as an adaptation to societal changes and current discourses about parenthood as well as a consequence of a contemporary lifestyle with many competing priorities.

Conclusion. Highly educated young women and men in contemporary Sweden have competing priorities when planning and setting goals for their lives, and having children is one of them. They describe fertility as an imperceptible and retrievable capacity and postponed parenthood as a rational adaptation to changes in society. These findings suggest that increased information about the limitations of human reproduction is needed, but also that societal support for younger parents is of utmost importance.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all informants.

Declaration of interest: The study was funded by the Medical Faculty at Uppsala University, Sweden. The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. T.T. had the idea for the study. T.T. and C.E. conducted the interviews. C.E. carried out the analysis in collaboration with M.L., T.T., and A.S.S. All authors contributed to the final manuscript.