Insights into the UDP-sugar selectivities of human UDP-glycosyltransferases (UGT): a molecular modeling perspective

Abstract

Enzymes of the human uridine diphosphate (UDP)-glycosyltransferase (UGT) superfamily typically catalyze the covalent addition of a sugar from UDP-sugar cofactors to relatively small lipophilic compounds. The sugar conjugates are often biologically less active with improved water-solubility, facilitating more effective elimination from the body. Experimental data indicate that UGT proteins exhibit differing selectivities toward various UDP-sugars. Although, three-dimensional (3D) structures of UGT proteins are required to provide insights into the UDP-sugar selectivities observed for the various UGT proteins, there are currently, no experimental structures available for human UGTs bound to UDP-sugar(s). Thus, the absence of 3D structures poses a major challenge for analyzing UDP-sugar selectivity at an atomic level. In this commentary, we highlight the application of comparative homology modeling for understanding the UDP-sugar selectivities of UGT proteins. Homology models of the C-terminal (CT) domain indicate a highly conserved structural fold across the UGT family with backbone root mean-squared deviations (rmsds) between 0.066 and 0.079 Å with respect to the UGT2B7-CT X-ray crystal structure. The models show that four residues in the terminal portion of the CT signature sequence play an important role in UDP-sugar selectivity. The N-terminal domain is less likely to be associated with UDP-sugar selectivity, although, a conserved residue, Arg-259 (UGT2B7 numbering) in the UGT 1 and 2 families may influence UDP-sugar selectivity. Overall, the models demonstrate excellent agreement with experimental observations in predicting the key residues that influence the selectivity of UDP-sugar binding.

• UDP-glycosyltransferases
• UDP-sugar
• aglycone
• homology model
• sugar selectivity
• structural waters
• molecular dynamics

Acknowledgements

The authors thank eResearch SA for computational time and data storage facility.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. P.C.N., R.M. and P.I.M. acknowledge Flinders University, Australian Research Council, and National Health and Medical Research Council, respectively, for fellowship funding.