Assessment of Breast Cancer-Related Arm Lymphedema—Comparison of Physical Measurement Methods and Self-Report

S. A. CzerniecFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, School of Molecular and Microbial Sciences, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

L. C. WardFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, School of Molecular and Microbial Sciences, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

K. M. RefshaugeFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, School of Molecular and Microbial Sciences, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

J. BeithFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, School of Molecular and Microbial Sciences, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

M. J. LeeFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, School of Molecular and Microbial Sciences, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

S. YorkFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, School of Molecular and Microbial Sciences, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

S. L. KilbreathFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, School of Molecular and Microbial Sciences, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.Correspondence[email protected]

show all

ABSTRACT

Purpose To determine the relationship between physical methods of measuring lymphedema and self-reported swelling, their reliability, and standard error of measurement. Method: Lymphedema in each arm of women with (n = 33) and without (n = 18) unilateral arm lymphedema, secondary to breast cancer was measured by self-report, bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS), perometer, and the truncated cone method. Results: The physical measurement tools were highly reliable (ICC_(2,1): 0.94 to 1.00) with high concordance (r_c: 0.89 to 0.99). Selfreport correlatedmoderately with physical measurements (r = 0.65 to 0.71) and was moderately reliable (ICC_(2,1): 0.70). Conclusions: Lymphedema assessment methods are concordant and reliable but not interchangeable.

Keywords: :

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the RT Hall Foundation and the National Breast Cancer Foundation, Australia. The authors gratefully acknowledge all of the women who participated in this study.

Declaration of Interest: Author Ward discloses that he has consulted ImpediMed Ltd., which has no involvement, financial or otherwise, in the conception and execution of this study or in the preparation of this manuscript.

Notes

¹Imp RSM version 1.12.0 and Bioimp version 2.25, ImpediMed Ltd., Brisbane, Australia.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Assessment of Breast Cancer-Related Arm Lymphedema—Comparison of Physical Measurement Methods and Self-Report

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Assessment of Breast Cancer-Related Arm Lymphedema—Comparison of Physical Measurement Methods and Self-Report

ABSTRACT

Acknowledgments

Notes

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature