1,729
Views
51
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

XELOX vs. FOLFOX in metastatic colorectal cancer: An updated meta-analysis

, , , &
Pages 94-104 | Received 18 Apr 2015, Accepted 03 Oct 2015, Published online: 11 Feb 2016
 

ABSTRACT

This meta-analysis aims to evaluate chemotherapy with XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) versus FOLFOX (fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin) as a treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in terms of efficacy and safety.

Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing XELOX versus FOLFOX were included.

A total of 4,363 patients from eight RCTs were available for analysis. Pooled analysis revealed that there were no statistical differences between both arms in OS, and ORR. XELOX arm had a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia, hand-foot syndrome, and diarrhea, whereas neutropenia had a higher incidence in the FOLFOX group.

For mCRC, the effect of XELOX is similar to FOLFOX.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.