CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS OF PSYCHOMOTOR VIGILANCE, MOOD, AND SLEEPINESS IN THE ULTRA-SHORT SLEEP/WAKE PROTOCOL

Abstract

Despite its advantages as a chronobiological technique, the ultra-short sleep/wake protocol remains underutilized in circadian rhythm research. The purpose of this study was to examine circadian rhythms of psychomotor vigilance (PVT), mood, and sleepiness in a sample (n=25) of healthy young adults while they adhered to a 3 h ultra-short sleep/wake protocol. The protocol involved 1 h sleep intervals in darkness followed by 2 h wake intervals in dim light, repeated for 50–55 h. A 5 min PVT test was conducted every 9 h with the standard metrics of mean reaction time (RT; RT_mean), median RT (RT_med), fastest 10% of responses (RT_10fast), and reciprocal of the 10% slowest responses (1/RT_10slow). Subjective measures of mood and sleepiness were assessed every 3 h. A cosine fit of intra-aural temperature, assessed three times per wake period, established the time of the body temperature minimum (T_min). Mood, sleepiness, and PVT performances were expressed relative to individual means and compared across eight times of day and twelve 2 h intervals relative to T_min. Significant time-of-day and circadian patterns were demonstrated for each of the PVT metrics, as well as for mood and sleepiness. Most mood subscales exhibited significant deterioration in day 2 of the protocol without alteration of circadian pattern. However, neither sleepiness nor performance was worse on the second day of observation compared to the first day. These data provide further support for the use of the ultra-short sleep/wake protocol for measurement of circadian rhythms. (Author correspondence: [email protected])

Keywords:

• Ultra-short sleep/wake protocol
• Circadian
• Neurobehavioral performance
• Mood
• Sleepiness
• Vigilance

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful for the help that Stephen C. Chen, Carrie E. Kline, Annie Y. Lee, and Mark R. Zielinski provided with data collection. We are also indebted to Dr. Marsha Dowda for assistance with data analysis.

The authors report no conflicts of interest, and alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.