ABSTRACT
Aim: Caloric restriction has been found to be protective against the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) in experimental animal studies. However, studies examining this association in humans are limited. In the present study, we examined whether individuals with anorexia nervosa, one marker of severe caloric restriction in humans, have a low incidence of T2D by using several Swedish registries. Methods: Individuals with anorexia nervosa were identified from the Swedish Hospital Discharge Register and Outpatient Register between 1964 and 2010. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) for T2D were studied among individuals with anorexia nervosa compared to those without the disorder. Results: A total of 17,135 individuals were identified with anorexia nervosa in Sweden. From this tally, 34 of them developed T2D, demonstrating a reduced risk of T2D with a SIR of 0.70, compared to individuals without anorexia nervosa. Patients with severe anorexia, indicated by more frequent hospitalizations, had a statistically non-significant lower incidence of T2D than those with fewer hospitalizations. A sibling study, controlled for familial confounding, found a statistically non-significant association between anorexia nervosa and T2D. Conclusion: Our study found that severe caloric restriction by using individuals with anorexia nervosa as a proxy was negatively associated with T2D, which might provide a biological basis for the primary prevention of T2D. Further studies are needed to explore whether moderate caloric restriction can effectively prevent the development of T2D in general population.
KEYWORDS:
Funding
This work was supported by grants to Dr Kristina Sundquist from the Swedish Research Council (K2009-70X-15428-05-3; K2012-70X-15428-08-3), to Dr Jan Sundquist from the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (2007–1754) as well as ALF funding from Region Skåne awarded to Jan Sundquist, Kristina Sundquist, and Dr Jianguang Ji. The funding agencies had no role in the design and conduct of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The researchers were independent of the funding agencies.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Jianguang Ji
JJ, KS, and JS were responsible for the study concept and design. JS and KS obtained funding. KS and JS acquired the data. JJ analyzed and interpreted the data. JJ, KS, and JS drafted the manuscript, and all authors revised it for important intellectual content.
Jan Sundquist
JJ, KS, and JS were responsible for the study concept and design. JS and KS obtained funding. KS and JS acquired the data. JJ analyzed and interpreted the data. JJ, KS, and JS drafted the manuscript, and all authors revised it for important intellectual content.
Kristina Sundquist
JJ, KS, and JS were responsible for the study concept and design. JS and KS obtained funding. KS and JS acquired the data. JJ analyzed and interpreted the data. JJ, KS, and JS drafted the manuscript, and all authors revised it for important intellectual content.