A psychometric evaluation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for the medically hospitalized elderly

Abstract

Background: Few psychometric studies of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scale have been performed with clinical samples of elderly individuals. Methods: The participants were 484 elderly (65–101 years, 241 men) patients in an acute medical unit. The HADS, the Montgomery–Aasberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and questionnaires assessing quality of life, functional impairment, and cognitive function were used. The psychometric evaluation of the HADS included the following analyses: 1) the internal construct validity by means of principal component analysis followed by an oblique rotation and corrected item–total correlation; 2) the internal consistency reliability by means of the alpha coefficient (Cronbach's) and 3) concurrent validity by means of Spearman's rho. Results: We found a two-factor solution explaining 45% of the variance. Six of seven items loaded adequately (≥0.40) on the HADS-A subscale (item 7 did not) and five of seven items loaded adequately on the HADS-D subscale (items 8 and 10 did not). Cronbach's alpha for the HADS-A and HADS-D subscale was 0.78 and 0.71, respectively. The correlation between HADS-D and the MADRS, a measure of the concurrent validity, was 0.51. Conclusion: The HADS appears to differentiate well between depression and anxiety. The internal consistency of the HADS in a sample of elderly persons was as satisfactory as it is in samples with younger persons. In contrast to younger samples, item 8 (“I feel as if I have slowed down”) did not load adequately on the HADS-D subscale. This may be attributed to the way elderly people experience and describe their symptoms.

• Factor analysis
• Principal component analysis
• Psychometric properties
• Quality of life
• Validation

Acknowledgement

The research was funded by collaboration between the Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services and the Innlandet Hospital Trust. The authors would like to thank Dr Hans Cato Guldberg (who has given helpful advice with the research) and the Medical Department, whose collaboration made the research possible.

Declaration of interest:The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.