391
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The Norwegian version of the PTSD Checklist (PCL): Construct validity in a community sample of 2004 tsunami survivors

, , M.D., &
Pages 355-359 | Accepted 29 Dec 2011, Published online: 10 Feb 2012
 

Abstract

Background: The PTSD Checklist (PCL) is a widely used self-administered measure of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and it has been validated in a variety of languages and cultures. Aim: Evaluate the diagnostic validity of the Norwegian version of a specific PCL (PCL-S) for detecting PTSD in epidemiological research. Methods: Participants were severely exposed Norwegian survivors from the 2004 South-East Asian tsunami. Of 75 individuals asked to participate, 63 responded (84%). PTSD was assessed by PCL-S and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I). These instruments were compared to evaluate the diagnostic validity of the PCL. We used two different scoring methods to diagnose PTSD based on PCL. The first method was based on the dichotomized sum score (cut-off ≥ 50) and the second was based on the flowchart method following DSM-IV symptom criteria. Area under the curve (AUC), Cohen's kappa, sensitivity and specificity were used to evaluate the agreement between the PCL and SCID-I. Results: According to the clinical interview, 11.3% of the participants met the diagnostic criteria for PTSD. The two scoring methods of PCL-S revealed similar results: according to both methods, 14.5% were categorized with PTSD. AUC was 0.98 (95% CI 0.93–1.00). For Cohen's kappa, the agreement was 0.71. Sensitivity was 0.86 and specificity 0.95. Agreement between PCL and SCID-I investigated for each of the three symptom clusters of PTSD and for the 17 individual items showed mostly a moderate to substantial agreement. Conclusions: The Norwegian version of the PCL-S performed well as a diagnostic instrument for detecting PTSD in epidemiological research.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.