156
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Epiphora after Uncomplicated Phacoemulsification: Study of Prevalence and Associated Factors

, , &
Pages 271-274 | Received 03 May 2014, Accepted 31 Aug 2014, Published online: 06 Nov 2014
 

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the prevalence of epiphora and associated factors after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Methods: Prospective and descriptive design. A group of 125 patients was asked about tearing one to two weeks after cataract surgery. A comprehensive examination was performed on the patients who answered affirmatively. All patients were re-interviewed by phone after three months and those who complained of epiphora were explored again. Results: Two weeks after surgery, prevalence of epiphora was 10.4%, but only 3.2% appeared after surgery. In patients with preoperative epiphora, the most frequently associated factors were ocular surface alterations (89%) and unctual and canalicular stenosis (56%). In patients with “new onset” epiphora (4 patients), these factors were: blepharitis (2/4), low tear break-up time (2/4), high tear meniscus (2/4), partial nasolacrimal duct obstruction (2/4), and unctual stenosis (1/4). Three months after surgery, the prevalence of epiphora was 13%, but only 7% appeared after surgery (6 patients). Of those 6 patients, 4 were re-examined: nasolacrimal duct obstruction (2/4), ocular surface problems (3/4), and unctual stenosis (1/4). Conclusions: Presence of epiphora two weeks after phacoemulsification was infrequent, despite being present in a high proportion of patients before surgery. There was not a noticeable increase in epiphora at three months. The most frequently related factors were mixed disorders of the ocular surface and lacrimal system, without an important incidence of unctual and canalicular stenosis. We consider that our perception about complaints from patients after phacoemulsification may be biased due to those who had previously suffered from epiphora.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.