197
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Diagnostic Consistency and Relation Between Optical Coherence Tomography and Standard Automated Perimetry in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

, &
Pages 185-190 | Received 24 Nov 2014, Accepted 26 Apr 2015, Published online: 06 Jul 2015
 

Abstract

Purpose: To assess diagnostic consistency and relation between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and standard automated perimetry (SAP) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: This retrospective study comprised 51 eyes of 51 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of POAG. The qualitative and quantitative SD-OCT parameters (retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses [RNFL; average, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal], RNFL symmetry, rim area, disc area, average and vertical cup/disc [C/D] ratio and cup volume) were compared with parameters of SAP (mean deviation, pattern standard deviation, visual field index, and glaucoma hemifield test reports). Results: Fifty-one eyes of 51 patients with POAG were recruited. Twenty-nine eyes (56.9%) had consistent RNFL and visual field (VF) damage. However, nine patients (17.6%) showed isolated RNFL damage on SD-OCT and 13 patients (25.5%) had abnormal VF test with normal RNFL. In patients with VF defect, age, average C/D ratio, vertical C/D ratio, and cup volume were significantly higher and rim area was lower when compared to those of the patients with normal VF. In addition to these parameters, worsening in average, superior, inferior, and temporal RNFL thicknesses and RNFL symmetry was significantly associated with consistent SD-OCT and SAP outcomes. Conclusions: In routine practice, patients with POAG can be manifested with inconsistent reports between SD-OCT and SAP. An older age, higher C/D ratio, larger cup volume, and lower rim area on SD-OCT appears to be associated with detectable VF damage. Moreover, additional worsening in RNFL parameters might reinforce diagnostic consistency between SD-OCT and SAP.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.