Patient Perception and Emotional Disturbance in Out-of-Hour Ophthalmic Emergency Care

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To investigate patient’s perception of the severity of their symptoms, reasons for attending an ophthalmic emergency department (ED) out of hours, and to review the prevalence of anxiety and depression. Methods: We carried out a prospective analysis of the cases presenting out of hours (8:30 PM to 8:30 AM) over a four-month period. We also conducted two questionnaire studies. First, patient’s perception of the severity of their symptoms (graded from 1–10). A score of 7 or above was defined as significant. A second questionnaire study used the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), with a maximum score of 21. Patients who scored between 7–10 points on either anxiety or depression scales are defined as borderline; above 10 as pathological. Results: A total of 1,531 patients attended the out-of-hours service. The most common diagnoses were trauma (22.8%), infective conjunctivitis (10.2%), and contact-lens-related problems (6.6%). Of 175 completed questionnaires, worry about sight impairment and pain were the most common concerns for attendance. A total of 91% of patients believed their conditions were emergencies that require medical review within 24 hours. 127 HADS questionnaires were completed, showing that 18.9% and 15.0% of patients were suffering from borderline and pathological anxiety, respectively, with a mean HADS-A score of 6.5, SD=3.9. The prevalence of possible and pathological depression was 14.2% and 6.3%, mean=4.9 (SD=3.6). There was no statistical significance difference of score with the time of patient presentation. Conclusion: The prevalence of anxiety and depression is relatively high in patients who attended the ophthalmic ED and awareness of psychological impact should be raised amongst healthcare professionals.

Keywords:

• Anxiety
• depression
• emergency
• mental health
• ophthalmology

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article. The authors certify that all applicable institutional and governmental regulations concerning the ethical use of human volunteers were followed during this research.