Ablative fractional laser treatment for hypertrophic scars: comparison between Er:YAG and CO₂ fractional lasers

Abstract

Background: Nonablative fractional photothermolysis has been reported to show early promise in the treatment of hypertrophic scars, but there are few reports on ablative fractional photothermolysis for the treatment of hypertrophic scars. Aim: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of Er:YAG fractional laser (EYFL) and CO₂ fractional laser (CO₂FL) for treatment of hypertrophic scars. Methods: Thirteen patients with hypertrophic scars were treated with 2,940 nm EYFL, and ten were treated with 10,600 nm CO₂FL. An independent physician evaluator assessed the treatment outcomes using Vancouver scar scale (VSS) and 5-point grading scale (grade 0, no improvement; grade 1, 1–25%; grade 2, 26–50%; grade 3, 51–75%; grade 4, 76–100% improvement). Patients are queried about their subjective satisfaction with the treatment outcomes. Results: After the final treatment, average percentage changes of VSS were 28.2% for EYFL and 49.8% for CO₂FL. Improvement was evident in terms of pliability, while insignificant in terms of vascularity and pigmentation. Based on physician's global assessment, mean grade of 1.8 for EYFL and 2.7 for CO₂FL was achieved. Patient's subjective satisfaction scores paralleled the physician's objective evaluation.Conclusion: CO₂FL is a potentially effective and safe modality for the treatment of hypertrophic scars, particularly in terms of pliability.

Key words::

• hypertrophic scars
• laser treatment
• fractional photothermolysis
• ablative fractional photothermolysis
• nonablative fractional photothermolysis