210
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
RE-EVALUATION OF CELLULAR RADIOSENSITIZATION BY 5-FLUOROURACIL

Re-evaluation of cellular radiosensitization by 5-fluorouracil: High-dose, pulsed administration is effective and preferable to conventional low-dose, chronic administration

&
Pages 851-862 | Received 12 Jun 2012, Accepted 10 Apr 2013, Published online: 15 May 2013
 

Abstract

Purpose: It is widely believed that the anticancer drug 5- fluorouracil (5-FU) must be administered chronically and in low doses to maximize radiosensitization during chemoradiotherapy. The rationale is based upon cell experiments that assumed identical mechanisms of 5-FU action between low-dose chronic (LDC) and high-dose pulsed (HDP) exposures. Here we challenge the paradigm and demonstrate the effectiveness of HDP 5-FU as a radiosensitizer and the wide range of dose/time schedules that can be used to synergize with radiation as compared to the relatively restrictive protocols prescribed for current LDC administrations.

Materials and methods: Clonogenic survival of human glioblastoma and colon cancer cell lines, U87MG-VIII and HCT-116, respectively, was used to assess temporal and dose effects of 5-FU on radiosensitivity and in split-dose experiments to characterize changes in sublethal damage repair.

Results: We show that HDP 5-FU administration does indeed radiosensitize both the highly radioresistant U87MG-VIII and HCT-116. Additionally, we show that this radiosensitization lasts for at least 24 h if cells are pre-irradiated with 2 Gy immediately after HDP 5-FU exposure as a result of a decrease in sublethal damage repair capacity for subsequent irradiations, suggesting the ideal combination of 5-FU bolus injection with fractionation radiotherapy schemes.

Conclusions: 5-FU bolus administration protocols combined with radiation would not only help improve treatment outcomes and reduce development of 5-FU resistance, but it would greatly benefit patients by shortening clinical stays and lowering overall therapeutic costs.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.