Responses to superficial heating and cooling differ in men and women with knee osteoarthritis

Craig R. Denegar Human Performance Laboratory and Physical Therapy Program, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USACorrespondence[email protected]

, PhD,

Maureen E. Schimizzi Human Performance Laboratory and Physical Therapy Program, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA

, BS,

Devon R. Dougherty Human Performance Laboratory and Physical Therapy Program, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA

, DPT, BS,

Jacob E. Friedman Human Performance Laboratory and Physical Therapy Program, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA

, DPT, BS,

James E. Clark Human Performance Laboratory and Physical Therapy Program, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA

, MS,

Brett A. Comstock, Human Performance Laboratory and Physical Therapy Program, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA

, MA, BS &

William J. Kraemer Human Performance Laboratory and Physical Therapy Program, Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA

, PhD show all

Abstract

This investigation assessed differences between the response of men and women with knee osteoarthritis to superficial heat, cold, or contrast therapy applied with a water-circulating system or a standard heating pad, and rest. We further analyzed data from a previous study to better understand the influence of gender on the response to treatment based on Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales and a visual analog pain scale (VAS). Using a within-subject, randomized order design, 34 patients received each treatment in 1-week blocks. A KOOS questionnaire and VAS were completed at baseline and twice each week. Women were more likely to report clinically meaningful improvement in pain and symptoms on the KOOS with the use of heat, cold, and a heating pad. There were no significant differences in response to treatment between men and women for the function-daily living and quality of life subscales or percent pain reduction on the VAS. Men and women reported improved quality of life with intervention. Women are more likely to report clinically meaningful improvement in pain and symptoms associated with knee OA following the use of superficial heat, cold, or a heating pad than men.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Responses to superficial heating and cooling differ in men and women with knee osteoarthritis

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Responses to superficial heating and cooling differ in men and women with knee osteoarthritis

Abstract

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature