![Sample our Health and Social Care journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5938/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Health-Social-Care.jpg"})
Abstract
Background and aims: Although the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) mandates service user involvement in developing treatment guidelines, questions arise concerning appropriate mechanisms of involvement and its impact. This study sought to elicit users' perceptions of their involvement.
Method: Grounded theory was used to analyse transcripts from interviews with 10 service user guideline development group representatives.
Results: Four categories emerged suggesting that participants drew upon expertise developed through experience and impact upon the process and product of guideline development. Unwritten rules and social comparisons influence deliberations.
Conclusions: Service users reported making a useful contribution despite intrinsic barriers.
Keywords:
Declarations of interest: Emma Harding was a former service user guideline development group member. Catherine Pettinari was Centre Manager of the National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health while this study was conducted. Mark Hayward and Dora Brown declare no competing interests. Funding was from the University of Surrey.