3,087
Views
33
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Body weight supported treadmill training versus traditional training in patients dependent on walking assistance after stroke: a randomized controlled trial

, , &
Pages 210-219 | Accepted 01 May 2011, Published online: 16 Dec 2011
 

Abstract

Purpose: Treadmill training with body weight support (TTBWS) for relearning walking ability after brain damage is an approach under current investigation. Efficiency of this method beyond traditional training is lacking evidence, especially in patients needing walking assistance after stroke. The objective of this study was to investigate change in walking and transfer abilities, comparing TTBWS with traditional walking training. Methods: A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Sixty patients referred for multi-disciplinary primary rehabilitation were assigned into one of two intervention groups, one received 30 sessions of TTBWS plus traditional training, the other traditional training alone. Daily training was 1 hr. Outcome measures were Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC), Walking, Functional Independence Measure (FIM); shorter transfer and stairs, 10 m and 6-min walk tests. Results: Substantial improvements in walking and transfer were shown within both groups after 5 and 11 weeks of intervention. Overall no statistical significant differences were found between the groups, but 12 of 17 physical measures tended to show improvements in favour of the treadmill approach. Conclusions: Both training strategies provided significant improvements in the tested activities, suggesting that similar outcomes can be obtained in the two modalities by systematic, intensive and goal directed training.

Implications for Rehabilitation

  • Treadmill training with body weight support (TTBWS) and traditional gait training were found to be equally effective in improving walking and transfer in patients dependent on walking assistance after stroke.

  • However, most outcome measures showed a tendency of improvement in favour of the treadmill group.

  • Both training modalities were systematic, goal-directed and intensive, and the time used for training was the same.

  • The choice between the two equally effective training alternatives should be based on the patients’ preference, and availability of equipment and resources.

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority for financial research support. Thanks to the participants; the patients, therapists, assessors and the staff at the brain department for contributions to fulfil this study.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.