2,991
Views
65
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives in Rehabilitation

Pacing as a strategy to improve energy management in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: a consensus document

, , &
Pages 1140-1147 | Received 10 Jan 2011, Accepted 24 Oct 2011, Published online: 19 Dec 2011
 

Abstract

Purpose: Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating condition characterized by a number of symptoms which typically worsen following minimal exertion. Various strategies to manage the limited energy levels have been proposed. Of these, pacing has been consistently rated as one of the most helpful in surveys conducted by patient groups. This review is a response to the paucity of the information on pacing in the scientific literature. Method: We describe the principle of pacing and how this can be adapted to meet individual abilities and preferences. A critical evaluation of the research was conducted to ascertain the benefits and limitations of this strategy. Results: Based on various studies, it is proposed that pacing can help to stabilize the condition and avoid post-exertional malaise. Conclusion: Pacing offers practitioners an additional therapeutic option which is acceptable to the majority of patients and can reduce the severity of the exertion-related symptoms of ME/CFS.

Implications for Rehabilitation

  • Pacing is a strategy which helps patients with ME/CFS limit exertion-related increases in symptomatology.

  • Pacing is appropriate for those who operating near or at their maximum level of functioning, and for individuals with neurological and immunological abnormalities.

  • Pacing may be offered as part of an individualized, multi-component management programme.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank all the patients and our colleagues for their helpful comments on earlier drafts.

Ellen M. Goudsmit: initiating the review, designing the format and writing of the manuscript. Jo Nijs: designing the format and writing of the manuscript. Leonard A. Jason: writing of the manuscript; Karen E. Wallman: writing of the manuscript. Jo Nijs is guarantor.

Declaration of Interest: There are no competing interests to declare. This review was self-funded.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.