225
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Comparison of visual acuity charts identifying visual impairment among older people outside the eye clinic

, , , &
Pages 1394-1400 | Received 22 Sep 2011, Accepted 02 Oct 2012, Published online: 21 Nov 2012
 

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluate the construct validity and describe sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of two short charts of visual acuity (VA) and examine whether these can identify and detect signs of visual impairment among older people. Method: The study included 43 persons, >65 years, with age related eye disease, living in their own homes. An ophthalmologist assessed the individuals’ VA at an eye clinic with the 5 m KM chart. A research assistant assessed individuals’ VA by the 1 m KM chart and the Visual Acuity Screening Test in their home environment. Results: All persons with a VA level of <0.5 were correctly identified by both instruments. The instruments have good positive and negative predictive values for the 1 m KM chart (73% and 100%) and for the Visual Acuity Screening Test (69% and 100%). The construct validity between the instruments was good, but the assessment at the eye clinic assessed the participants as having higher VA level. Conclusions: Both instruments have good construct validity, considering they were carried out in poorer lighting conditions and a good predictive value for screening out VA levels <0.5. The 1 m KM chart showed the best agreement with the 5 m KM chart.

Implications for Rehabilitation

  • Short charts of visual acuity (VA) can be used outside the eye clinic to identify persons with VA level 0.5, in need of rehabilitation, as they are at risk of becoming dependent in daily activities.

  • Short charts of VA are portable instruments and useful in other environments than the eye clinic, but training is needed before use.

  • Short charts of VA are useful instruments that can be included in Comprehensive Geriatric Assessments (CGA) to identify persons with visual impairment.

Declaration of Interest: This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Blind National Federation and the association of “De Blindas Vänner”. The authors state that they have no conflicts of interest.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.