346
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Psychometric properties of the Five-Digit Test in patients with stroke

, , , , , & show all
Pages 97-102 | Received 10 Aug 2014, Accepted 16 Mar 2015, Published online: 07 Apr 2015
 

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the ecological validity, predictive validity, and responsiveness of the Five Digit Test (FDT) in patients with stroke. Methods: We included inpatients with stroke (n = 144, 114 and 105 in the ecological validity, predictive validity, and responsiveness analysis, respectively) in the study. At admission, the FDT and Barthel Index (BI) were assessed; at discharge, the FDT, BI, Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS), and Mobility Subscale of the Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (MO-STREAM) were assessed. Results: In the ecological validity analysis, the scores of the selective and alternating attention indices of the FDT were moderately correlated with those of the BI at admission and discharge (Spearman ρ = –0.38 to –0.45). In the predictive validity analysis, the scores of the two attention indices of the FDT at admission were moderately correlated with the scores of the BI, PASS, and MO-STREAM at discharge (ρ = –0.33 to –0.45). In the responsiveness analysis, the two attention indices of the FDT between admission and discharge had large differences (success rate difference = 0.56–0.67, Wilcoxon Z = –5.90 to –6.60). Conclusion: Our results indicate that the selective and alternating attention indices of the FDT have acceptable ecological validity, predictive validity, and good responsiveness in patients with stroke.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • The Five Digit Test (FDT), an efficient and culture-free assessment tool, has been used to assess selective attention and alternating attention

  • The selective index and alternating attention index of the FDT showed acceptable ecological validity, predictive validity, and good responsiveness in patients with stroke.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the participants and raters for their work during data collection.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. This study was supported by a research grant from the National Science Council Taiwan. The grand numbers were NSC97-2314-B-002-010-MY3 and NSC102-2314-B-002-018-MY3.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.