Diversity of mutations in the RET proto-oncogene and its oncogenic mechanism in medullary thyroid cancer

Abstract

Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy and accounts for nearly 1% of all of human cancer. Thyroid cancer has four main histological types: papillary, follicular, medullary, and anaplastic. Papillary, follicular, and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas are derived from follicular thyroid cells, whereas medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) originates from the neural crest parafollicular cells or C-cells of the thyroid gland. MTC represents a neuroendocrine tumor and differs considerably from differentiated thyroid carcinoma. MTC is one of the aggressive types of thyroid cancer, which represents 3–10% of all thyroid cancers. It occurs in hereditary (25%) and sporadic (75%) forms. The hereditary form of MTC has an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance. According to the present classification, hereditary MTC is classified as a multiple endocrine neoplasi type 2 A & B (MEN2A & MEN2B) and familial MTC (FMTC). The RET proto-oncogene is located on chromosome 10q11.21. It is composed of 21 exons and encodes a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase. RET regulates a complex network of signal transduction pathways during development, survival, proliferation, differentiation, and migration of the enteric nervous system progenitor cells. Gain of function mutations in RET have been well demonstrated in MTC development. Variants of MTC result from different RET mutations, and they have a good genotype–phenotype correlation. Various MTC related mutations have been reported in different exons of the RET gene. We proposed that RET genetic mutations may be different in distinct populations. Therefore, the aim of this study was to find a geographical pattern of RET mutations in different populations.

• Thyroid carcinoma
• medullary
• RET
• proto-oncogene
• mutation
• diversity
• MEN2A
• MEN2B
• FMTC
• population

Acknowledgements

The authors thank many colleagues for their helpful discussions.

Declaration of interest

The authors do not have any actual or potential conflict of interest of the work submitted. All authors agreed to submit the work to Journal of Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences, and the work has not been submitted to another journal. This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.