817
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Genomic imbalance defines three prognostic groups for risk stratification of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

, , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 920-928 | Received 25 Mar 2013, Accepted 10 Sep 2013, Published online: 12 Nov 2013
 

Abstract

Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) has yet to be fully leveraged in a prognostic setting in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Genomic imbalance was assessed in 288 CLL specimens using a targeted array. Based on 20 aberrations in a hierarchical manner, all 228 treatment-naive specimens were classified into a group with poor outcome (20.6%) exhibiting at least one aberration that was univariately associated with adverse outcome (gain: 2p, 3q, 8q, 17q, loss: 7q, 8p, 11q, 17p, 18p), good outcome (32.5%) showing 13q14 loss without any of the other 10 aberrations (gain: 1p, 7p, 12, 18p, 18q, 19, loss: 4p, 5p, 6q, 7p) or intermediate outcome (remainder). The three groups were significantly separated with respect to time to first treatment and overall survival (p < 0.001), and validation of the stratification scheme was performed in two independent datasets. Gain of 3q and 8q, and 17p loss were determined to be independent unfavorable prognostic biomarkers. TP53, NOTCH1 and SF3B1 mutations correlated with the presence of one poor outcome aCGH marker, at a considerably higher frequency than when only considering poor risk aberrations routinely detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). These data support genomic imbalance evaluation in CLL by aCGH to assist in risk stratification.

Acknowledgements

We thank Charles Ma and Ben Ritter for technical assistance.

Potential conflict of interest:

Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text of this article at www.informahealthcare.com/lal.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.