In Vitro Efficacy of Known P-Glycoprotein Modulators Compared to Droloxifene E and Z: Studies on a Human T-Cell Leukemia Cell Line and their Resistant Variants

Abstract

P-glycoprotein(P-gp)- related resistance is one of the major obstacles in treating leukemia patients. Therefore, it is of clinical interest to find new potential modulators and compare their P-gp-modulating efficacy. The present analysis investigated the influence of P-gp modulators, such as verapamil, tamoxifen, droloxifene E., droloxifene Z., SDZ PSC 833 (PSC 833) and dexniguldipine in a leukemic T-cell line (CCRF-CEM) and its P-gp-resistant counterparts (CCRF-CEM/ACT400 and CCRF-CEM/VCR1000). P-gp expression was assessed with an immunocytological technique using the monoclonal antibody 4E3.16. It was characterized as the percentage of P-gp positive cells and also expressed as a D value by using the Kolmogorov Smirnov statistic. The efficacy of P-gp modulators was determined with the rhodamine-123 accumulation test and the MTT test. An in vitro modulator concentration between 0.1 μM and μM was determined, where no genuine antiproliferative effect was apparent. The modulators PSC 833 and dexniguldipine were the significant (p < C0.05) most potent chemosensitizers followed by verapamil, droloxifene Z, tamoxifen and droloxifene E in descending order. In addition to the modulators PSC 833 and dexniguldipine, droloxifene Z should especially be considered as a candidate for future ex vivo and in vivo studies. The main advantage of droloxifene Z could be the low rate of expected side effects. This fact permits the use of high Drol Z dosage in order to achieve a relevant modulating effect in vivo and to use this drug in combination with a further modulator so as to reach maximum efficacy with tolerable side effects.

Key Words:

• P-glycoprotein
• MDR
• droloxifene
• tamoxifen
• in vitro P-glycoprotein modulation