![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Cytochemical staining for leukemia typing is declining in hematology laboratories, but the use of flow cytometry may not be possible in some settings. Aberrant cytochemical nonspecific esterase/α-naphthyl acetate esterase (NSE/αNAE) positive B-lymphoblasts can cause confusion with monoblasts, a potentially dangerous pitfall. This unusual cytochemical NSE/αNAE positivity had been associated with relatively poorer outcome of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in the era prior to the advent of routine multicolor flow cytometric immunophenotyping. We reviewed morphological, cytochemical and flow-cytometric data from five cases of B-lineage ALL that showed NSE/αNAE positivity and were diagnosed definitively using multi-parametric flow cytometric immunophenotypic analysis. Diffuse or dot-like (localized) strong cytochemical NSE/αNAE activity was detected in all cases and all showed one or more features of high risk disease. The number of NSE/αNAE positive blasts in the marrow varied from 10 to 75%. The morphological differential diagnoses included T-lymphoid lineage ALL and acute monoblastic leukemia (AML-M5). Flow cytometric data revealed B-lineage antigens and the absence of monocytic or other myeloid markers resolved the diagnosis. These cases underscore the importance of immunophenotyping in all cases of suspected ALL regardless of the cytochemical findings. Although the numbers are small, the association with high risk disease observed in all five of our cases may corroborate the previously reported poor prognostic value of such aberrant cytochemical staining.
Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. Each author participated sufficiently to share responsibility for the content.