Useful information for hypertension management reform in community health care: prevalence, awareness, treatment and control among Guangzhou adults

Abstract

Background: Objective data on hypertension prevalence and management in local areas are scarce. We assessed the prevalence of hypertension and its management in Guangzhou adult population.

Methods: A stratified multistage cluster sampling with probability proportional to size method was used in this survey. Information on a total of 23 939 respondents, aged 15 years old or above, having a gender ratio of 0.997 (male versus female) with completed questionnaire and blood pressure measurement, was obtained. Hypertension was defined as having a mean SBP of at least 140 mm Hg, a DBP of at least 90 mm Hg, and/or the prescription of antihypertensive drugs. Information related to the history of hypertension and treatment of hypertension was collected through a questionnaire.

Results: The prevalence of hypertension was 11.8%. Among patients with hypertension, 54.4% were aware of their elevated BP, 49.3% had treatment, and 23.3% achieved targeted BP control. Among those who were aware of their hypertension, 90.4% underwent treatment, and among those who were treated, 43.6% were well controlled. Although the prevalence, awareness and treatment of hypertension varied significantly among adults with several social economics status, the control of hypertension did not show significant differences. Among treated patients, the control of hypertension showed significant differences among adults with education, occupation, insurance and income.

Conclusions: It is the first time for Guangzhou to describe epidemic and management of hypertension. A baseline was established, which could provide useful information not only to policymakers but also to developing countries with a close urbanization and aging rate similar to Guangzhou.

• Awareness
• control
• hypertension
• prevalence
• socioeconomic status
• treatment

Acknowledgements

This survey was supported by grants from Guangzhou Government for Public Health Service. The authors are grateful for the use of data from 12 communities. We also thank the 12 subordinative CDCs and communities, who carried the original survey and assistant us to complete the data analysis.