Use of a qualitative methodological scaffolding process to design robust interprofessional studies

Abstract

Increasingly, researchers are using qualitative methodology to study interprofessional collaboration (IPC). With this increase in use, there seems to be an appreciation for how qualitative studies allow us to understand the unique individual or group experience in more detail and form a basis for policy change and innovative interventions. Furthermore, there is an increased understanding of the potential of studying new or emerging phenomena qualitatively to inform further large-scale studies. Although there is a current trend toward greater acceptance of the value of qualitative studies describing the experiences of IPC, these studies are mostly descriptive in nature. Applying a process suggested by Crotty (1998) may encourage researchers to consider the value in situating research questions within a broader theoretical framework that will inform the overall research approach including methodology and methods. This paper describes the application of a process to a research project and then illustrates how this process encouraged iterative cycles of thinking and doing. The authors describe each step of the process, shares decision-making points, as well as suggests an additional step to the process. Applying this approach to selecting data collection methods may serve to guide and support the qualitative researcher in creating a well-designed study approach.

Keywords::

• Qualitative research method
• interprofessional collaboration
• theoretical lens

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Alana Hosegood for her assistance with the preparation of this manuscript for submission.

Declaration of interest

The first author was supported by the following funding sources: The Manitoba Initiative: Interprofessional Education for Collaborative Patient-Centred Practice-Scholarship, The Jewish Foundation of Manitoba Academic Excellence Award, the Manitoba Society of Occupational Therapists Research Fund, and the Canadian Occupational Therapy Foundation Doctoral Scholarship. The second author is supported by the Manitoba Health Research Council. The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this paper.