5
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

A Comparison of Two Methods of Teaching A Reading Task to Mildly Intellectually Handicapped Adolescents

, , , , &
Pages 28-32 | Published online: 10 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

A group of eight mildly intellectually handicapped trainees at a Work Preparation Centre were taught to read two lists of words of equal difficulty by different methods. A pilot experiment had indicated that trainees had learned to read a list of difficult tool names incidentally while using an auto-instructional device (a 3M Sound-on-Slide projector) to identify the names of the tools orally. In the present experiment the effectiveness of this approach was compared with a more traditional paired-associate method of teaching word recognition.

Results indicated that there were no differences between the methods on the rate of acquisition, nor were there differences between the levels of rentention after one week, one month, three months or six months. At least 90% of the words were retained on both lists by all students at the end of the six months period.

The results are discussed in the context of theories of attention, associated clustering and overlearning. The implications for the use of auto-instructional devices are explored.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.