1,713
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The effect of male body mass index on sperm parameters

&
Pages 155-158 | Received 18 Jul 2009, Accepted 09 Nov 2009, Published online: 11 Jan 2010

Abstract

Overweight and obese men have been reported to have lower sperm quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate, whether body mass index (BMI) is related to changes in semen parameters. In a cross-sectional study, sperm parameters were reviewed in 852 normal, healthy men, of reproductive age (25–50). BMI was divided into four groups: underweight, normal, overweight and obese. Sperm concentration of overweigh and obese men were 63 and 62, respectively, which were lower than subjects with normal BMI (71). Total sperm count and sperm motility in overweight and obese men were significantly lower than men with normal BMI too. Sperm morphology in study groups was similar. The results revealed a significant inverse correlation between the BMI and the sperm parameters.

Introduction

Obesity is a well recognised risk factor for female infertility [Citation1]. Overweight and obese female typically are insulin resistant [Citation2], have polycystic ovarian syndrome [Citation3] and have a poor fertility prognosis [Citation4]. It is well documented that excessive weight can also lead to spontaneous abortions [Citation5,Citation6]. However, its relation to decreased sperm count was not documented until recently [Citation7,Citation8]. It is known that the incidence of obesity is reaching epidemic levels in the western world (including male infertility). Recently, the prevalence of male obesity in the US was reported to be 30.6% [Citation9].

Male factors alone constitute 25–30% of all cases of infertility, and they contribute to another 30% in combination with female factors. Known aetiologies of male infertility include cryptorchidism, testicular torsion or trauma, varicocele, seminal tract infections, anti-sperm antibodies, hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, gonadal dysgenesis and obstruction of the reproductive channels [Citation10]. Obesity was recently proposed for addition to this list [Citation7]. Thus, obesity is a chronic disease resulting in compromised physical and psychological well-being, and it may contribute to reduced fecundity as well [Citation11].

Little information exists on the impact of body mass index (BMI) on male fertility or semen parameters. It is possible that the increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity accounts for a portion of the trend, albeit a widely debated one, of decreasing sperm counts over recent decades. Some epidemiological studies have investigated that, high or low BMI was associated with reduced semen quality [Citation7,Citation12,Citation13]. Some studies show that men with excess body weight are at increased risk of infertility [Citation7,Citation14,Citation15]. Despite the published literature on male semen quality and reproductive hormones and BMI [Citation14,Citation16], only one study could be found in the literature that had examined the relationship between individual BMI and semen parameters in fertile men with normal reproductive endocrines status such as luteinising hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone (T) and estradiol (E2) [Citation18]. Our study objective was to determine the relationship between BMI and semen parameters (sperm quantity) in fertile men with normal reproductive endocrines status (without intermediate role of reproductive hormones).

Methods

Eight hundred fifty two normal, healthy men, of reproductive age (ranges 25–50 years) were enrolled in a cross-sectional study from October 2004 to September 2006 in Shahid Sedughi hospital, Yazd, Iran. The subjects were selected in both urban areas and rural areas. Men who suffered from chronic diseases such as diabetes, kidney disease, atherosclerosis, vascular disease and hypertension were excluded from the study. Subjects with genital diseases, heavy smoking were also excluded. None of the men had previous surgery (e.g., vasectomy reversal or varicocele removal). The trained staff informed the subjects about the study and obtained their informed consent.

All subjects completed a questionnaire on the day of the physical examination by face-to-face interview. The questionnaire included information on their demographic characters. Physical examinations were performed by a trained physician (urologic trained physicians). Blood samples were collected from a cubital vein. Serum concentrations of hormones (T, FSH, LH and E2) were measured by radioimmunoassay, and abnormal results excluded from study.

The weight of the subjects was measured in kilograms using one weighing scale (Seca 880 Weight Scale); Height was measured in centimeters without shoes (Leicester Height Measure). The BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the squared height in meters (kg/m2). The possible presence of a varicocele, a hydrocele, the location of testis in scrotum, and the consistency of the testis and epididymis were also recorded. Patients were grouped according to published BMI ranges as follows: underweight, <18.5 kg/m2; normal, 18.5–24.9 kg/m2; overweight, 25–30 kg/m2 and obese, >30 kg/m2 [Citation19].

Semen specimens were collected in the morning, by masturbation in a sterile plastic container in a private room near the laboratory after a period of 2 days of sexual abstinence. A single semen sample was collected from each man. All the semen samples were kept at 37°C to liquefy (After 30-min liquefaction) to make routine semen analysis according to the World Health Organization guidelines [Citation20]. The semen smears were air-dried, stained and preserved, and the same technician assessed blindly all the smeared slides to determine sperm morphology. Smears were examined under oil immersion, the semen characteristics were quantified by using a Makler semen counting chamber under the 200× magnification of an Olympus CH 2 phase contrast light. The following semen variables were used as outcome variables: semen volume, sperm concentration, total sperm count, percentage of motile spermatozoa (percentage of sperm with rapid and linear progressive motility and sluggish linear motility). Normal values for standard sperm parameters were considered as sperm concentration ≥20 × 106/ml, total sperm count ≥40 × 106/ejaculate and percentage of sperm motile ≥50% [Citation20]. Data from all patients were used in the analysis. SPSS 15.0 was used for statistical analysis. The t-test was used to compare differences between the two groups, and P value <0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of subjects were shown in . The subjects had the BMI of 24.7 ± 3.6 kg/m2. 16 subjects (1.8%) were classified as underweight, 604 (70.9%) as normal weight, 213 (25%) as overweight and 19 (2.2%) as obese. Most of the study population (91.4) has ≥12 years of education. There were no significant differences between BMI groups for abstinence and smoking. No seasonal changes in this study population were observed in terms of semen quality.

Table I.  Characteristics of study population according to different body mass index (BMI) groups.

The results revealed a significant correlation between the BMI and the sperm concentration, total sperm count and motile sperm. Median sperm concentration of overweight and obese men were 63 and 62, respectively (P = 0.02 and P = 0.01, respectively) which were lower than the subject with normal BMI. Total sperm count in overweight and obese men were significantly lower than normal men too (100 and 94, respectively P = 0.00 in both). There were no significant difference in concentration and total sperm count between underweight men and normal group. Sperm motility in the obese men was lower than normal group, (50 vs. 68, P = 0.00) but in overweight and underweight, had no significant differences. Sperm morphology in study groups was similar .

Table II.  Estimated mean ± SD of semen analysis between different body mass index (BMI) groups.

Discussion

Body mass index is associated with alterations in sperm parameters in several reports. However, its relation to decreased sperm count was not documented until recently [Citation7,Citation21]. In a recent study investigating factors associated with semen quality among couples who visited an assisted reproduction clinic, men with poor semen quality were three times more likely to be obese than men with normal semen quality. There was also a significant negative correlation between semen quality parameters and BMI among men with normal semen quality [Citation8]. In this study, an inverse relationship between overweight and obesity and the total number, concentration and number of motile sperm cells per subject was observed. Men with a BMI >25 kg/m2 have fewer sperm number, concentration and number of normal motile sperm cells per ejaculate when the BMI was >30 kg/m2. Our results confirm the findings of many other studies [Citation7,Citation8,Citation11], which have shown that sperm quality especially sperm concentration and normal motile sperm cells, decrease as body weight increases. However, our study is unique in that, it clearly shows the effects of BMI on sperm quality and this information is obtained from overweight men who have normal reproductive hormones and it is different from other studies, that included reproductive hormones to explain the association between BMI and semen quality [Citation14]; or examine the relationship of semen parameters, sexual function-related hormones and waist/hip ratio [Citation12]; or the study that showed overweight and obese men have a markedly changed sex hormone profile in serum, whereas reduction of semen quality [Citation22].

In converse to Qin et al. [Citation14] study, in this study there were no significant differences in total number, concentration and number of motile sperm between underweight and normal men. An interesting finding from the regression analyses is that overweight men have the same number of motile sperm as normal men. Therefore, there is a rapid loss of sperm motility with modest weight gain.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the current study indicated that semen parameter was reduced among overweight and obese men compared with normal BMI and this can be important in infertile couple with male factor and their treatment programme, and weight loss can improve semen quality.

Acknowledgement

The authors are thankful to the laboratory personnel of Shahid Sedughi hospital.

References

  • Pasquali R, Pelusi C, Genghini S, Cacciari M, Gambineri A. Obesity and reproductive disorders in women. Hum Reprod Update 2003;9:359–372.
  • Chang SA, Kim HS, Yoon KH, Ko SH, Kwon HS, Kim SR, et al Body mass index is the most important determining factor for the degree of insulin resistance in non-obese type 2 diabetic patients in Korea. Metabolism 2004;53:142–146.
  • Moran L, Norman RJ. Understanding and managing disturbances in insulin metabolism and body weight in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004;18:719–773.
  • Barbieri RL. The initial fertility consultation: recommendations concerning cigarette smoking, body mass index, and alcohol and caffeine consumption. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1168–1173.
  • Lashen H, Fear K, Sturdee DW. Obesity is associated with increased risk of first trimester and recurrent miscarriage: matched case–control study. Human Reprod 2004;19:1644–1646.
  • Bellver EJ, Rossal LR, Bosch E, Zúñiga A, Corona JT, Fernando Meléndez. Obesity and the risk of spontaneous abortion after oocyte donation. Fertil Steril 2003;79:1136–1140.
  • Jensen TK, Andersson AM, Jorgensen N, Andersen AG, Carlsen E, Petersen JH. Body mass index in relation to semen quality and reproductive hormones among 1,558 Danish men. Fertil Steril 2004;82:863–870.
  • Magnusdottir EV, Thorsteinsson T, Thorsteinsdottir S, Heimisdottir M, Olafsdottir K. Persistent organochlorines, sedentary occupation, obesity and human male subfertility. Hum Reprod 2005;20:208–215.
  • Cynthia LO, Margaret DC, Lester RC, McDowell MA, Carolyn JT, Katherine M. Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA 2006;295:1549–1555.
  • Oehninger S. Clinical and laboratory management of male infertility: an opinion on its current status. J Androl 2000;21:814–821.
  • Watkins ML, Rasmussen SA, Honein MA, Botto LD, Moore CA. Maternal obesity and risk for birth defects. Pediatrics 2003;111:1152–1158.
  • Fejes I, Koloszar S, Szollosi J, Zavaczki Z, Pal A. Is semen quality affected by male body fat distribution? Andrologia 2005;37:155–159.
  • Kort HI, Massey JB, Elsner CW, Mitchell-Leef D, Shapiro DB, Witt MA. Impact of body mass index values on sperm quantity and quality. J Androl 2006;27:450–452.
  • Qin DD, Yuan W, Zhou WJ, Cui YQ, Jun-Qing Wu J, Gao ES. Do reproductive hormones explain the association between body mass index and semen quality? Asian J Androl 2007;9:827–834.
  • Sallmen, Markku, Sandler, Dale P, Hoppin. Reduced fertility among overweight and obese men Epidemiology 2006;17:520–523.
  • Nguyen, Ruby H, Wilcox N, Allen J, Rolv S, Donna D. Men's body mass index and infertility. Human Reprod 2007;22:2488–2493.
  • Winters SJ, Wang C, Abdelrahaman E, Hadeed V, Dyky MA, Brufsky A. Inhibin-B levels in healthy young adult men and prepubertal boys: is obesity the cause for the contemporary decline in sperm count because of fewer Sertoli cells? J Androl 2006;27:560–564.
  • Stewart TM, Liu DY, Garrett C, Jørgensen N, Brown EH, Baker HW. Associations between andrological measures, hormones and semen quality in fertile Australian men: inverse relationship between obesity and sperm output. Hum Reprod 2009;24:1561–1568.
  • WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004;363:157–163.
  • World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm cervical mucus interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
  • Hammdoud AO, Gibson M, Peterson CM, Hamilton B, Carrell DT. Obesity and male reproductive potential. J Androl 2006;27:619–626.
  • Aggerholm AS, Thulstrup AM, Toft G, Ramlau-Hansen CH, Bonde JP. Is overweight a risk factor for reduced semen quality and altered serum sex hormone profile? Fertil Steril 2008;90:619–626.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.