102
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Phylogenetic analysis of Pythium insidiosum Thai strains using cytochrome oxidase II (COX II) DNA coding sequences and internal transcribed spacer regions (ITS)

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 289-295 | Received 13 Feb 2010, Accepted 25 Jul 2010, Published online: 06 Sep 2010
 

Abstract

To investigate the phylogenetic relationship among Pythium insidiosum isolates in Thailand, we investigated the genomic DNA of 31 P. insidiosum strains isolated from humans and environmental sources from Thailand, and two from North and Central America. We used PCR to amplify the partial COX II DNA coding sequences and the ITS regions of these isolates. The nucleotide sequences of both amplicons were analyzed by the Bioedit program. Phylogenetic analysis using genetic distance method with Neighbor Joining (NJ) approach was performed using the MEGA4 software. Additional sequences of three other Pythium species, Phytophthora sojae and Lagenidium giganteum were employed as outgroups. The sizes of the COX II amplicons varied from 558–564 bp, whereas the ITS products varied from approximately 871–898 bp. Corrected sequence divergences with Kimura 2-parameter model calculated for the COX II and the ITS DNA sequences ranged between 0.0000–0.0608 and 0.0000–0.2832, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis using both the COX II and the ITS DNA sequences showed similar trees, where we found three sister groups (ATH, BTH, and CTH) among P. insidiosum strains. All Thai isolates from clinical cases and environmental sources were placed in two separated sister groups (BTH and CTH), whereas the Americas isolates were grouped into ATH. Although the phylogenetic tree based on both regions showed similar distribution, the COX II phylogenetic tree showed higher resolution than the one using the ITS sequences. Our study indicates that COX II gene is the better of the two alternatives to study the phylogenetic relationships among P. insidiosum strains.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by grants from Ratchadaphiseksomphot (No.RA 68/52), Faculty of Medicine, and some financial support from the 90th Anniversary of Chulalongkorn University Fund (Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund), Graduate School, Chulalongkorn University. Our special thank are address to Professor Dr Boonsirm Withyachumnarnkul for supporting about the equipment and reagents, Associate Professor Dr Srisurang Tantimavanich and Dr Jidapa Supabandhu for P. insidiosum strains used during the investigation. Finally, we thank Ms Poomjit Yumyourn, Ms Kanyarat Piromman and all the laboratory technicians at the Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University for facilitating the study.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

This paper was first published online on Early Online on 7 Sep 2010.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.