Selection for Dutch postgraduate GP training; time for improvement

Abstract

Background: In the Netherlands we select candidates for the postgraduate GP training by assessing personal qualities in interviews. Because of differences in the ratio of number of candidates and number of vacancies between the eight departments of GP training we questioned whether the risk of being rejected diverged amongst them.

Objective: The research question of this study was to which degree department of choice, candidates’ characteristics and qualities assessed during interviews explain admission into GP training.

Methods: A nationwide observational study was conducted of all candidates who applied for postgraduate GP training in 2009/ 2010. Application ratio per department, candidates’ characteristics (gender, age, region of medical school and times of application) and qualities (motivation, orientation on the job, personal attributes and learning needs) were collected. Outcome measures were admission to interview and admission to GP training.

Results: The study population addressed 542 candidates. Sixty three candidates were rejected on application letter (11.6%). So 479 candidates were admitted to the interview, of which 340 were admitted to the GP training (71%). Gender and region of medical school outside North West Europe were associated with admission to the interview. Department of choice had a strong association with admission in both stages (RR: 0.30 to 0.74; 0.20 to 0.79 respectively), while candidates’ qualities explained admission (RR: 1.09– 1.25) as well.

Conclusion:The influence of department of choice yields doubts about fairness of the procedure. So advantages and disadvantages of a national procedure are discussed as well as those of a competency based procedure.

Key words::

• Post graduate GP training
• Selection
• Fairness
• Europe
• General Practice

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.