4,504
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Development and validation of an improved Bradford method for determination of insulin from chitosan nanoparticulate systems

, , &
Pages 966-973 | Received 16 May 2009, Accepted 10 Sep 2009, Published online: 23 Aug 2010
 

Abstract

Context: Blank chitosan nanoparticles are currently used as reference for the calibration curve, which fails to resolve the supernatant of the nanoparticles in the interference of Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 reagent; supernatants are generated at different chitosan nanoparticulate prescriptions, which have different interferences. There are notable errors in the experimental results, and the method is not feasible.

Objective: In this study, an improved, rapid, and economic Bradford method was developed and validated.

Materials and methods: The pH of the supernatant of blank chitosan nanoparticles was adjusted to 7–9 through adding saturated NaOH. The precipitation (free chitosan) in the solution was separated by centrifuging for about 10 min (4000 r/min).

Results: The method eliminated the interference of free chitosan of different prescriptions. The results showed that the method presented a linearity in the range of 50–300 μg/mL (R2 = 0.9992), and possessed a good inter-day and intra-day precision based on relative standard deviation values (less than 3.10%). Recovery of the supernatant of blank chitosan nanoparticles was between 98.30 and 99.93%, and the recovery of blank chitosan nanoparticles was between 95.57 and 100.27%.

Discussion and conclusion: The method was further tested for determination of the association efficiency of insulin to nanoparticulate carriers composed of chitosan. Encapsulant release under simulated gastrointestinal fluids was evaluated.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the staff of the Central Laboratory and College of Life Science and Biopharmacology, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, who provided much of the equipment and guidance for the experiments.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.