258
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Validity and responsiveness of a self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 358-361 | Received 27 Jun 2014, Accepted 26 Aug 2014, Published online: 08 Oct 2014
 

Abstract

Objectives. A self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q) was developed by the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF). The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity and responsiveness of the SAFE-Q in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods. In total, 180 patients with RA answered the SAFE-Q. Of 180 patients, 34 answered the SAFE-Q twice, preoperatively and postoperatively, to assess responsiveness. Construct validity was tested by comparing the 5 SAFE-Q subscales and the JSSF standard rating system for the RA foot and ankle scale (JSSF-RA), a Japanese version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (JHAQ), disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), and clinical disease activity index (CDAI). Responsiveness was examined by calculating the standardized response mean (SRM) and effect size (ES) 3 months after surgery.

Results. There were moderate correlations between the SAFE-Q and the JSSF-RA and JHAQ. Conversely, a low correlation was observed between the SAFE-Q and DAS28, SDAI, and CDAI. The responsiveness was high, with an SRM of 0.9 and ES of 0.7 for pain subscales.

Conclusion. SAFE-Q is a useful tool for assessing the foot and ankle in RA patients.

Acknowledgment

The authors are deeply grateful to Jun Hashimoto, M.D., Ph.D., Hideki Tsuboi, M.D., Ph.D., Makoto Hirao, M.D., Ph.D., Naoki Tazaki, P.T., and Kohei Kushimoto, P.T. at the National Hospital Organization Osaka Minami Medical Center for making enormous contribution to this study.

Conflict of interest

None.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.