220
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
CASE REPORT

Rhodamine intense pulsed light versus conventional intense pulsed light for facial telangiectasias

, , , , &
Pages 80-85 | Received 26 Apr 2015, Accepted 26 Jun 2015, Published online: 25 Feb 2016
 

Abstract

Facial telangiectasias represent the major aesthetic alterations of several chronic inflammatory disorders arising on facial skin. We herein report on relevant clinical results of a new subtype of intense pulsed light treatments, the so-called rhodamine intense pulsed light (r-IPL), in comparison with conventional IPL (c-IPL) treatments on forty-five patients affected by facial telangiectasias. The aim of this study is to determinate whether r-IPL represents an effective and safe treatment for the most common superficial vascular alterations and could be advised as a first choice therapy for facial telangiectasias.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Ing. Tiziano Zingoni, for the precious technical assistance in the preparation of the article and for digital drawings of the tables and figures.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.