274
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Intrapartum translabial ultrasound with pushing used to predict the difficulty in vacuum-assisted delivery of fetuses in non-occiput posterior position

, , , , &
Pages 3400-3405 | Received 29 Oct 2015, Accepted 08 Dec 2015, Published online: 14 Jan 2016
 

Abstract

Objective: Our aim is to evaluate the capacity of intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU) with pushing in the prediction of difficulty of fetal extraction in vacuum assisted deliveries. Prospective, observational study performed (2/2015–8/2015) on 75 nulliparous women, ≥37 weeks with singleton pregnancies at full dilatation who had ITU-with-pushing performed, previous to vacuum-placement for fetal extraction. Working on the translabial sagittal-plane, we assessed: Angle-Progression (AoP), Progression-Distance (PD) and Head-Direction (HD); in the axial plane we evaluated: Midline-Angle (MLA) and Head-Perineum-Distance (HPD). Vacuum extractions were classified as easy-difficulty (ED) (≤3 vacuum-pulls), difficult-unsuccessful (DD) (>3 vacuum-pulls). We did not assess occipito-posterior-presentations.

Results: Seventy nulliparous were studied (44-ED,26-DD). We observed no differences in obstetric, neonatal or intrapartum characteristics between the two study groups, with the following exceptions: newborn weight (3272 ± 438 g versus 3540 ± 372 g; p = 0.011) and number of vacuum-pulls (1.4-ED-vs-4.4-DD; p <0.0005). AoP-pushing was 143.9° ± 14.6° in ED and 115.1°± 12.9° in DD (p <0.0005); Head-Up was 79.5% versus 38.4% (p <0.0005); PD-Pushing was 42.7 ± 11.3 mm versus 30.4 ± 9.8 mm (p <0.0005); MLA-Pushing was 27.6°± 26.6° versus 57.5°±26.5°(p=0.025); HPD-Pushing was 40.8 ± 10.0 mm versus 47.4 ± 10.9 mm (p = 0.039).

Conclusion: We identified that the presence of an AoP-Pushing > 128° predicts an Easy-Vacuum-Delivery (≤3 Vacuum-Pulls) in  >85% of cases (Sen 80%–FPR 9.3%).

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.