157
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Racial and ethnic disparities in universal cervical length screening with transvaginal ultrasound

, , &
Pages 4078-4081 | Received 02 Dec 2015, Accepted 19 Feb 2016, Published online: 18 Mar 2016
 

Abstract

Objective: Determine if race or ethnicity is associated with missed or late transvaginal cervical length screening in a universal screening program.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of nulliparous women with singleton gestations and a fetal anatomical ultrasound from 16–24 weeks’ gestation from January 2012 to November 2013. We classified women into mutually exclusive racial and ethnic groups: non-Hispanic black (black), Hispanic, Asian, non-Hispanic white (white), and other or unknown race. We used log-binomial regression to calculate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of missed or late (≥20 weeks’ gestation) screening versus optimally timed screening between the different racial and ethnic groups.

Results: Among the 2967 women in our study population, 971 (32.7%) had either missed or late cervical length screening. Compared to white women, black (RR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1–1.5) and Hispanic (RR:1.2; 95% CI: 1.01–1.5) women were more likely to have missed or late screening. Among women screened, black (versus white) women were more likely to be screened late (RR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.6–3.1).

Conclusions: Black and Hispanic women may be more likely to have missed or late cervical length screenings.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Anna Merport Modest and JoAnn Jordan for their help with creating the dataset used in this study.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no declaration of interest.

This work was conducted with support from Harvard Catalyst | The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health Award UL1 TR001102) and financial contributions from Harvard University and its affiliated academic health-care centers.

Dr. H.H.B is funded by NIH/NIEHS K23 ES022242.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.