Abstract
Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease exacerbations are associated with worsening of airway inflammation, the nature of which may be neutrophilic, eosinophilic, or both.
Objective: The primary objective was to examine the cellular nature of airway inflammation in successive COPD exacerbations in order to ascertain if they changed in individual patients. The secondary objective was to estimate the relative risk indicating the extent to which a particular type of exacerbation changed as a function of the most recent exacerbation. Design: This was a retrospective survey performed on a computerised sputum cell count database of a referral respiratory service in Hamilton, Canada. Recurrent event analyses were used to model the incidence of exacerbations and subtypes of exacerbations. Results: 359 patients and 148 patients had sputum examined during stable condition and during exacerbations, respectively. It was found 65 patients had sputum examined during both situations. The exacerbations were eosinophilic in 15.9%, neutrophilic in 18%, combined in 2.6%, of unknown clinical significance in 19.6% and normal in 19.6%. There were missing counts for 24.3% samples. In 85.2% of patients, a different subtype of bronchitis was noted in successive exacerbations. The relative risk of a subsequent neutrophilic or eosinophilic exacerbation was 6.24 (p = 0.02) and 2.8 (p = 0.24) when the previous exacerbation was neutrophilic or eosinophilic respectively. Conclusions: This non-intervention study suggests that the cellular nature of bronchitis is largely unpredictable and needs to be examined at each COPD exacerbation This has important implications in choosing the appropriate therapy. Future intervention studies would provide further evidence.
Acknowledgments
Hongyu Wang and Angira Dasgupta made equal contributions to the manuscript.
Funding
Richard J. Cook and Parameswaran Nair are supported by the Canada Research Chair Program.
Declaration of Interest Statement
Parameswaran Nair is listed on a patent for a sputum filtration device (no commercial gains), has provided consultancy to a university spin-off company (Cellometrics) and has received honoraria and grants (invstigator-initiated projects, paid to university) from AZ, GSK, Novartis, BI, Sanofi, Roche and Teva. Other authors have no conflict of interest to declare. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.