915
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letter to the Editor

In Reply re: “Comparison of F(ab’)2 versus Fab antivenom for Pit Viper Envenomation: A Prospective, Blinded, Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial”

, , , &
Pages 414-415 | Received 02 Feb 2015, Accepted 02 Feb 2015, Published online: 23 Feb 2015
 

Declaration of interest

Rare Disease Therapeutics, Inc. (RDT) sponsored this study through contracts with the authors’ affiliated institutions, and Instituto Bioclon, SA de CV provided the F(ab’)2 antivenom for this study. The authors report remuneration for educational presentations from BTG international Inc (BTG) (SPB, AMR) and from RDT (AMR); participation in an expert panel sponsored by BTG that developed a treatment algorithm for pit viper envenomation (SPB, AMR, SAS); being investigators in phase 2 and/or phase 3 clinical trials of a black widow spider antivenom manufactured by Instituto Bioclon, under contract with Rocky Mountain Poison & Drug Center (SPB, AMR, SAS); being investigators in phase 2 and/or phase 3 clinical trials of a scorpion antivenom manufactured by Instituto Bioclon (AMR, LVB); and receiving a contract from Instituto Bioclon for development of North African antivenom (LVB).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.