1,192
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Children

Reliable classification of children’s fractures according to the comprehensive classification of long bone fractures by Müller

, , , , &
Pages 207-212 | Received 14 Jun 2012, Accepted 25 Sep 2012, Published online: 18 Dec 2012
 

Abstract

Background and purpose Guidelines for fracture treatment and evaluation require a valid classification. Classifications especially designed for children are available, but they might lead to reduced accuracy, considering the relative infrequency of childhood fractures in a general orthopedic department. We tested the reliability and accuracy of the Müller classification when used for long bone fractures in children.

Methods We included all long bone fractures in children aged < 16 years who were treated in 2008 at the surgical ward of Stavanger University Hospital. 20 surgeons recorded 232 fractures. Datasets were generated for intra- and inter-rater analysis, as well as a reference dataset for accuracy calculations. We present proportion of agreement (PA) and kappa (K) statistics.

Results For intra-rater analysis, overall agreement (κ) was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68–0.81) and PA was 79%. For inter-rater assessment, K was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.61–0.80) and PA was 77%. Accuracy was estimated: κ = 0.72 (95% CI: 0.64–0.79) and PA = 76%.

Interpretation The Müller classification (slightly adjusted for pediatric fractures) showed substantial to excellent accuracy among general orthopedic surgeons when applied to long bone fractures in children. However, separate knowledge about the child-specific fracture pattern, the maturity of the bone, and the degree of displacement must be considered when the treatment and the prognosis of the fractures are evaluated.

The expert reference coding by senior orthopedic surgeon Trygve Søvik MD is highly appreciated. The study was supported by a grant from the Stavanger Health Trust Research Council.

The study was designed by TM, KH, MA, AJA, and KS. Software preparation for the registration was done by KH. Data analysis was done by TM, MA, CHE, AJA, and KS. TM, MA, and KS wrote the manuscript.

No competing interests declared.