1,240
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Posttraumatic midshaft clavicular shortening does not result in relevant functional outcome changes

Observations in 32 healed, nonoperatively treated fractures

, , , , , & show all
Pages 545-552 | Received 20 Nov 2014, Accepted 06 Mar 2015, Published online: 01 Sep 2015
 

Abstract

Background and purpose — Shoulder function may be changed after healing of a nonoperatively treated clavicular fracture, especially in cases of clavicular shortening or mal-union. We investigated scapular orientations and functional outcome in healed clavicular fractures with and without clavicular shortening.

Patients and methods — 32 participants with a healed nonoperatively treated midshaft clavicular fracture were investigated. Motions of the thorax, arm, and shoulder were recorded by standardized electromagnetic 3D motion tracking. The DASH score and Constant-Murley score were used to evaluate functional outcome. Orientation of the scapula and humerus at rest and during standardized tasks, and strength and function of the affected shoulders were compared with corresponding values for the uninjured contralateral shoulders.

Results — Mean clavicular shortening was 25 mm (SD 16). Scapula protraction had increased by mean 4.4° in rest position in the affected shoulders. During abduction, slightly more protraction, slightly more lateral rotation, and slightly less backward tilt was found for the affected shoulders. For anteflexion, the scapular orientations of the affected shoulders also showed slightly increased protraction, slightly increased lateral rotation, and slightly reduced backward tilt. Scapulohumeral kinematics, maximum humerus angles, and strength were not associated with the degree of clavicular shortening. All participants had excellent performance on the Constant-Murley score and DASH score.

Interpretation — Scapulohumeral kinematics in shoulders with a healed clavicular fracture differ from those in uninjured shoulders, but these changes are small, do not result in clinically relevant changes in outcome, and do not relate to the amount of clavicular shortening. These findings do not support routine operative reduction and fixation of shortened midshaft clavicular fractures based on the argument of functional outcome.

SAS, PBW, JdG, JN, PK, and IBS designed the study protocol. SAS and SB were involved in patient selection, and SAS, PBW and SB were involved in acquiring the data. Data analysis was performed by SAS, PWB, SB, JdG, and PK. All the authors were involved in writing the manuscript.

No competing interests declared.