46
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Factors influencing children's judgments of overweight peers

, , , , , & show all
Pages e449-456 | Received 09 Dec 2009, Published online: 03 Jan 2011
 

Abstract

Objective. This study assessed children's perceptions of an overweight or non-overweight target of name-calling. Methods. Participants were 4th and 5th grade students. Children selected a line drawing of an overweight or a non-overweight child as a target. After this, they viewed each line drawing again and rated each child's social attraction, niceness, experience of negative emotions, size, and popularity (whether others would like the child). Finally, children provided ideas for improving acceptance of the line-drawing they selected as a target of name-calling. Results. Findings from regression analyses indicated that children who reported higher levels of victimization and selected the overweight child as a target reported higher social attraction for this target. Children's weight status and their victimization interacted to influence ratings of niceness and negative emotions. Children reported that peers would like the overweight line drawing less than the non-overweight one. Conclusions. Children tended to report that an overweight child would be a target of name-calling and be less accepted. Our findings provided partial support for the idea that children's own victimization status influenced ratings of social attraction, niceness, and negative emotions. Longitudinal studies will provide information on change in perceptions over time.

Acknowledgements

Appreciation is extended to the University of Cincinnati for funding this project. Appreciation is extended to Trisha Taylor, Erin Henderson, and Cathy Odar for help with collecting data. The authors would like to thank Heather Lehmkuhl and Emily Iobst for all their contributions to team efforts to uncover ideas about stigma toward children who are overweight.

Declaration of interest: This study was funded by the University of Cincinnati. The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.