488
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

The cutlery effect: do designed products for people with disabilities stigmatise them?

, , &
Pages 661-667 | Received 20 Oct 2014, Accepted 14 Apr 2015, Published online: 04 May 2015
 

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate of how assistive cutlery design effects perception of the user. Studies regarding the usage and development of assistive cutlery have primarily focused on the ergonomics, whereas research into the aesthetics of assistive cutlery has been minimal. A method based on Canter’s “Room Inference Protocol” from the field of environmental psychology was used to evaluate the aesthetics of the assistive cutlery. A series of images were digitally composited and a survey was deployed online, with an outcome of 562 usable responses. The results demonstrated that the female model with assistive cutlery was perceived to be less attractive, less stylish and less sporty in comparison with the male model that was utilising identical pieces of assistive cutlery. The research contributes to the existing literature in the field, complimenting the study by Torrens and Smith and validating the need for greater aesthetic consideration in addition to an ergonomically acceptable response for assistive cutlery. This in turn highlights the importance of industrial design for the context and adaptations of use, rather than just a design response given to the physical manifestation of a product.

    Implications for Rehabilitation

  • Reduced grip can be not only physically debilitating but also socially isolating through stigmatisation.

  • Current assistive cutlery may be ergonomically sound, but aesthetically lacking.

  • Large, multinational study demonstrates significant gender effect relating to the perception of women using these devices.

Acknowledgements

The authors of this paper wish to acknowledge and thank the contribution of Associate Professor Denny Meyer from Swinburne University of Technology for her assistance with the analysis of the data.

Declaration of interest

This research was funded through an Australian Postgraduate Award PhD scholarship.

Notes

1The word “designerly” is defined by Cross [Citation18] as a way of communicating and understanding design knowledge.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.