Feasibility and cost analysis of implementing high intensity aphasia clinics within a sub-acute setting

Abstract

The current study explored the clinical feasibility and costs of embedding three different intensive service delivery models for aphasia treatment (computer, group therapy, and therapy with a speech pathology therapy assistant) within three sub-acute facilities. The study employed a two cohort comparison design, with the first cohort (n = 22) receiving the standard service of treatment currently offered. This treatment was delivered by a speech-language pathologist and involved on average 3 hours of treatment/week over 8 weeks. Participants in the second cohort (n = 31) received one of the three intensive treatment models providing up to 9 hours of therapy/week for 11 weeks. Organizational data was collected throughout treatment, with participant, caregiver, and clinician satisfaction with the intensive models also being measured. Participants completed the spoken language production sub-tests and the Disability Questionnaire of the Comprehensive Aphasia Test (CAT) pre- and post-treatment. All intensive models yielded high participant attendance, satisfaction, and significant improvements to the CAT sub-tests. The pro-rata cost of providing treatment per hour per client for the computer and group therapy models was found to be ˜ 30% cheaper compared to the standard service. The outcomes support the potential feasibility of embedding the different models into sub-acute facilities to enhance client access to intensive treatment for aphasia.

Keywords::

• Cost-analysis
• aphasia
• intensive treatment

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to sincerely thank the participants with aphasia and their caregivers for their involvement in the study, and the diligence and care of the SLPs involved in providing treatment at Gold Coast Hospital, QEII Jubilee Hospital and Ipswich Hospital. This study was funded by Queensland Health, Allied Health Profession's Office of Queensland Models of Care grant. Funding of computer equipment was also provided by the Rural Stroke Outreach Service.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.