174
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The outcome of management of “troublesome” vs “non-troublesome” phalangeal neck fractures in children less than 2 years of age

, , , &
Pages 93-101 | Received 07 Feb 2015, Accepted 03 Sep 2015, Published online: 05 Nov 2015
 

Abstract

Background: Several authors have indicated that there are specific poor prognostic factors which may affect the outcome of management of phalangeal neck fractures. In the authors’ centre, phalangeal neck fractures with any of these poor prognostic factors are labelled “troublesome”. Any of the following five criteria will qualify the fracture to be regarded as “troublesome”: concurrent vascular compromise of the fractured digit, open/partial amputation injuries, comminution of the fractured phalangeal head, concurrent epiphyseal or juxta-epiphyseal fractures distal to the fractured phalangeal head, and all Type III fractures (as per Al-Qattan classification).

Methods: The effect of these poor prognostic factors has not been investigated in the youngest paediatric age group; the hands of whom are known to be most forgiving. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcome of management of seven “troublesome” vs nine “non-troublesome” phalangeal neck fractures in children less than 2 years of age. Demographic data (age, sex, fracture site/type, and troublesome factors) were reviewed for the 16 cases. All patients were treated according to a specific protocol, and the outcome was documented using a modified Al-Qattan’s outcome grading system.

Results: Of the nine children with non-troublesome fractures, eight obtained a satisfactory outcome and the ninth case had an unsatisfactory outcome. In contrast, all seven children with troublesome fractures had an unsatisfactory outcome and the difference was highly significant (p = 0.0007).

Conclusion: The authors strongly advise discussing the outcome of troublesome fractures with the parents and also advise documenting this in the file (prior to management) for medico-legal reasons.

Acknowledgements

This study was approved by the Research Committee of the Department of Surgery at our institution.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The work was supported by the College of Medicine Research Center, Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.