4,071
Views
77
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Neurology: Original articles

Persistence with and adherence to fingolimod compared with other disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a retrospective US claims database analysis

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 696-707 | Accepted 27 Jun 2014, Published online: 23 Jul 2014
 

Abstract

Objective:

Achieving therapeutic goals in multiple sclerosis (MS) requires strict adherence to treatment schedules. This retrospective study analyzed persistence with, and adherence to, fingolimod compared with injectable/infusible disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in patients with MS.

Methods:

Patients in the PharMetrics Plus™ US administrative claims database with at least one prescription for, or administration of, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate (GA), interferon (IFN), or natalizumab (index DMT) between October 1, 2010 and September 30, 2011 were included. Patients were naïve to index DMT (no claim in the previous 360 days) and had an MS diagnosis code within 360 days of the first index DMT prescription. Outcomes were persistence, risk of discontinuing index DMT (evaluated by a Cox proportional hazards model), adherence (measured using the medication possession ratio [MPR] and proportion of days covered [PDC] in patients with at least two index DMT prescriptions), and the risk of being non-adherent (MPR <80% and PDC <80%, assessed using a logistic regression model).

Results:

The study included 3750 patients (fingolimod, n = 889; GA, n = 1233; any IFN, n = 1341; natalizumab, n = 287). Discontinuation rates (fingolimod, 27.9%; GA, 39.5%; IFN, 43.7%; natalizumab, 39.5%; all p < 0.001) and risk of discontinuation were significantly higher (hazard ratios vs fingolimod [95% confidence interval]: GA, 1.75 [1.49–2.07]; IFN, 2.01 [1.71–2.37]; natalizumab, 1.53 [1.22–1.91]) for patients receiving other DMTs compared with fingolimod. The risk of being non-adherent was also lower for patients in the fingolimod cohort than the other treatment cohorts, irrespective of whether non-adherence was defined as MPR <80% (p < 0.05 for all) or PDC <80% (p < 0.05 for GA and IFN).

Limitations:

As with all studies assessing real-world treatment patterns it is unclear if medications were used as prescribed.

Conclusions:

In a real-world setting, persistence with, and adherence to, oral fingolimod was higher than for injectable and infusible DMTs.

Transparency

Declaration of funding

This study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

Declaration of financial/other relationships

NB, RL, and GC are paid employees of Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. NA and AP are paid employees of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ. JRK, AAP, SUK, CBM, and CM are paid employees of IMS Health, Plymouth Meeting, PA. JME Peer Reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.

Acknowledgments

The authors take full responsibility for the content of the paper. The authors thank Dr Gemma Carter and Sebastian Reynolds (Oxford PharmaGenesis, Ltd) for medical writing support, editorial assistance, and collation and incorporation of comments from all authors.

Notes

*Gilenya is a registered trademark of Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

Copaxone is a registered trademark of Teva Pharmaceuticals, Petach Tikva, Israel.

Avonex is a registered trademark of Biogen Idec, Cambridge, MA, USA.

§Rebif is a registered trademark of Merck Serono SA, Genf, Switzerland.

Extavia is a registered trademark of Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

**Betaseron is a registered trademark of Bayer Healthcare, Leverkusen, Germany.

††Tysabri is a registered trademark of Biogen Idec, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.